Mission creep: ‘US UK getting sucked into Syrian hot war’


The presence of British, as well as American forces in Syria, is indisputably illegal under international law; this is an act of aggression no matter what the reason given by the US-led coalition, political commentators told RT.

The US-led coalition carried out a bombing raid against forces fighting for the Syrian government in the south of the country.

The coalition air strike targeting pro-government forces in Syria was unacceptable and violated the country’s sovereignty, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry.

The incident happened on Thursday close to Syria’s border with Iraq and Jordan near a remote base where the Pentagon trains its rebel forces.

RT: The US government said this latest strike did not mean a change in its Syria policy. Do you think that’s the case?

Peter Ford, former UK ambassador to Syria: No, it’s not. What we see here is a clear case of mission creep. The Americans may start out with the purest of intentions, but their actions show that they are being sucked into a hot war in Syria as – very significantly – are British forces. This comes, remember, in the middle of a British election campaign and the forces which the coalition aircraft allegedly were protecting include British, as well as American forces. Now, the UK parliament never mandated the government to send British ground troops into Syria. And here is clear evidence that they are there, they are in this hot war up to their necks… Also, their presence is indisputably illegal under international law, as of course is the presence of any US forces.

The US is trying to block the attempt of Russia in establishing the de-escalation zones in Syria. These strikes that come in the south-eastern part of Syria prove that the US is intending to escalate the tension in southern Syria as a part of its attempt first to drive a wedge between Damascus and Baghdad and prevent them from having any geographical link on the one hand. On the other hand, this also proves the US intends at imposing its own influence in southern Syria to destabilize the Syrian regime by hitting in the south while it was able to stabilize the situation in the north much to its favor by supporting the Kurds on one hand and the Turks on the other hand. – Dr. Jamal Wakeem, professor of history and international relations at Lebanese University in Beirut.

RT: The militia group hit by the air strike is involved in the fight against Islamic State. Is the US coalition playing a dangerous game by targeting such forces? rt.com

President al-Assad receives message from Iraqi PM on cooperation in combating terrorism

Int’l coalition’s attack on Syrian military site exposes its fake claims of fighting terrorism

10 Apr 2017
Russia and Iran say US has crossed ‘red line’ over airstrikes on Syria

Comments are closed.

Live Chat

Join the Live Chat